TRON (TRX) Casino Comparison for UK Players
Available in GB
A practical look at UK authorisation, payment claims and the limits of what can be verified about TRON gambling.
TRON Casinos in the UK: The Licensing Line Matters
When I first looked at crypto casinos, I assumed the important question was where the website was based. That sounds neat: a company operates from abroad, so surely its rules are the rules that matter. For a casino offering gambling to people in Great Britain, that is the wrong way to draw the line. The key issue is whether the operator has the licence required to serve this market.
The UK Gambling Commission regulates commercial gambling in Great Britain, including online casinos. It is the sole regulator for commercial gambling there. A remote operator cannot sidestep that requirement simply by locating its company, staff or essential equipment overseas: the Commission’s remit applies to remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain, regardless of where the key equipment sits.
That is the part I would keep in view when weighing up claims about TRON casinos for UK players. A site’s currency options, branding, language or apparent country of origin do not establish that it is authorised to serve customers here. Nor does a page calling itself a “UK casino” prove anything on its own. The licence is the dividing line. Plain and simple.
What a UKGC licence actually tells you
The Commission issues operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals who work in regulated roles. For a customer, the central point is that an online casino legally serving Great Britain must hold the appropriate current operating licence. A business registration elsewhere is not a substitute, and an offshore licence is not a UKGC licence.
I would check the operator’s entry on the Commission’s public register rather than rely on a badge in a website footer. The name on the register should make sense alongside the company named in the casino’s terms. If those details do not line up, or the licence claim cannot be confirmed, treat that as a warning rather than an invitation to fill in the gaps yourself. I have learned not to let polished wording do the checking for me.
Cardano ADA Casinos in the UK: Licensing and Payments
The Gambling Act 2005 governs gambling in England, Wales and Scotland; Northern Ireland has a different legal framework. So when people casually say “UK rules”, it is worth being precise: the Commission’s role described here is regulation of commercial gambling in Great Britain. Its licensing requirement applies to remote operators offering gambling to consumers there.
Offshore does not mean outside the rules
An offshore casino may be physically based elsewhere and still target people in Great Britain. If it does, its location does not remove the UK licensing requirement. An offshore licence may show that another authority has authorised the business under its own system, but it does not give the operator permission to offer gambling under a UKGC licence.
There is a distinction between the operator’s obligations and the player’s position. Offshore gambling by an individual is not criminalised in the UK. But that does not turn an unlicensed casino into a legal online casino serving Great Britain, and it does not give its customers the protections attached to a UKGC-regulated operator.
That difference matters if something goes wrong. With an offshore casino, you do not have the UKGC regulatory safety net, access to UKGC dispute resolution or an approved alternative dispute resolution route through the Commission’s system. You also should not expect GamStop integration. Being able to open a page or create an account is not the same as being covered by those safeguards. A website can be accessible while remaining outside the British licensing system.
I would not treat “international”, “independent” or “crypto-friendly” as a reassuring substitute for a licence. Those are descriptions, not regulatory status. And a claim that a casino is “best” or “trusted” does not answer the basic question of who regulates its offer to British customers. Marketing words are cheap. The register is the useful bit.
Do
- Check the operator’s entry on the UKGC public register
- Verify that the register name matches the company in the terms
Don’t
- Rely on a license badge in a website footer
- Assume polished wording or a “UK casino” page proves authorization
The practical test before you go further
For any site presented as a TRON casino in the UK, start with the operator, not the token. Find the legal company name in the terms and conditions, then check whether that company holds a current UK Gambling Commission operating licence for the relevant activity. If you cannot confirm it on the public register, do not assume that an overseas authorisation covers the gap.
That is a more reliable test than judging by a British flag, a UK-facing page or a statement that the casino accepts customers from Britain. The Commission regulates the gambling offer, not the visual impression the website creates. TRON branding does not change that licensing question.
I would also separate two ideas that are often bundled together in casino advertising: whether a site is reachable, and whether it is licensed to serve Great Britain. They are not interchangeable. Offshore sites can be accessible to residents, but accessibility is no endorsement and no promise of UK protections. If you choose to use one, understand that you are outside the UKGC complaints route, approved ADR and GamStop arrangements.
So the sensible starting point is not a ranking or a welcome banner. It is the licence status of the business behind the site. If the operator cannot be verified as licensed for Great Britain, do not mistake its location or its claims for permission to operate here.
BNB Casino Comparison in the UK: Licensing and Safety
Deposits and Withdrawals: What a TRON Payment Would Mean
A TRON wallet can make a casino payment look straightforward: send coins to an address, wait for the site to credit the account, then request a withdrawal back to a wallet. But that description skips the parts that matter when money is involved. A casino has to support the asset and network, explain when it credits deposits, and set out how withdrawals are reviewed. Without those details, the label “TRON casino” tells you very little about the actual payment journey.
I would not use Bitcoin Cash timings as a stand-in for TRX. They are different assets on different networks, and a BCH confirmation estimate cannot establish how quickly a TRON deposit will be credited. A specialist affiliate review of BCH casinos described deposits as being credited after one on-chain confirmation, with that confirmation taking around ten minutes. That is a report about BCH, not a reliable clock for a TRON wallet.
The same limit applies to cashouts. A specialist casino review reported that BC.Game and Stake had processed BCH withdrawals within ten minutes of a request, often in less than five. That does not establish how either operator handles TRX, whether a TRON withdrawal is available, or how long one would take. A withdrawal can also be held for a management review: one account of BCH casino terms described queues for larger requests, with the relevant threshold varying from 0.5 BCH to the equivalent of 2 BCH. Those are BCH-specific reported conditions, not a rule you can apply to TRX.
Different coin, different evidence.
Attention: Do not use Bitcoin Cash (BCH) confirmation timings or withdrawal reports as a reliable guide for TRON (TRX) transactions, as they are different assets on different networks.
Before sending funds to a casino with a TRON wallet option, I’d want to see the exact network named in the deposit instructions and make sure the wallet’s selected network matches it. A coin ticker on its own is not enough to confirm that two addresses are compatible. I’d also check whether the account balance is shown in TRX or converted to another currency, what exchange rate is used, and whether the cashier displays a minimum deposit or withdrawal condition. If those details are unclear, I wouldn’t send a test payment just to find out.
There is a privacy point worth keeping in view, too. BCH payments are recorded on a public blockchain, and specialist analysis firms can sometimes connect a deposit with an account at a known exchange. That is a BCH observation; it does not tell you how a particular TRON payment can be traced. In either case, a wallet payment should not be treated as automatically private simply because no bank card is involved.
A specialist review has also described BCH transfers as faster and cheaper than Bitcoin transactions, linking that comparison to BCH’s 32 MB block-size limit. That comparison is about Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin. It does not establish TRON fees, confirmation speed, or the total cost of moving TRX between a wallet and a casino.
The practical question is not just whether a cashier displays TRX. You need to know whether the deposit is credited automatically or after checks, whether withdrawals go to the same wallet, and what can delay or restrict a payout. Read the payment terms before transferring anything, and keep the transaction record and any support correspondence. If a site’s payment page gives no clear account of its process, treat that uncertainty as part of the cost.
Klarna at UK Casinos: Payment Options Explained
One more distinction matters in the UK: payment convenience does not tell you whether a casino is authorised to serve British customers. UK-licensed operators are prohibited from accepting cryptocurrency, so a TRX deposit option is not evidence of a UKGC-licensed casino. Keep the payment question separate from the licence question. That separation can save a headache.
Playing Online or on Mobile Doesn’t Change the Licensing Question
A casino can open in a browser, run in a mobile browser or offer an app. None of that tells you whether it is authorised to serve players in Great Britain. I used to treat a polished phone experience as a sort of reassuring signal. It isn’t. A site can look tidy on a small screen and still sit outside the UK Gambling Commission’s regulatory system.
The test is about the service being offered, not the device you use. Remote gambling operators selling to customers in Great Britain need the relevant UKGC licence, wherever their key equipment is located. So an online TRON casino aimed at British players does not become exempt because its servers, company or app store listing are elsewhere. Nor does a mobile version turn an offshore casino into a UK-licensed one.
That distinction matters when you see phrases such as “play anywhere” or “mobile ready”. They describe access, not regulatory status. An app icon is not a licence. A website loading quickly is not a licence either.
Remote gambling operators offering services to consumers in Great Britain must hold a UKGC license regardless of where their company, staff, or equipment are located.
What a phone can—and can’t—tell you
A mobile site may let you log in and use the same account as on desktop. That says something about the operator’s design. It does not establish that the operator accepts TRON, that a particular game is available, or that the casino holds a UKGC licence. Those are separate claims, and you should not let one stand in for another.
If you are considering an operator that says it serves Great Britain, check its name and licence details against the UKGC public register before you deposit. I would not rely on a badge displayed on the site alone. A licence needs to belong to the operator providing the gambling service; a familiar-looking logo or a mobile app listing does not prove that.
There is a practical difference if the operator is offshore. You are not breaking the law simply by gambling there, but you do not get the UKGC regulatory safety net. That means no UKGC dispute resolution and no GamStop integration through that operator. If something goes wrong, the route you might expect from a UK-licensed casino is not available. Small screen, same exposure.
Mobile play still sits inside the rules
For licensed online casinos, using a phone does not remove the rules that apply to gambling. Operators must verify a customer’s age before allowing deposits, and they must prompt new customers to set a financial limit before their first deposit, with account-level limit controls available. Those responsibilities belong to the operator; they are not optional extras that disappear in an app.
There are also rules specific to online slots in Britain. Autoplay is banned, and each spin must last at least 2.5 seconds. A mobile interface cannot make those requirements vanish. If an app or browser experience makes a claim about being designed for British players, its presentation alone cannot show that it is meeting the rules.
I would keep the checks in separate boxes: can I access the site on my phone; does it actually offer the service it claims; and is the operator licensed for Great Britain? The first is about software. The last is the one that determines whether UK gambling regulation applies. Don’t confuse the two.
UK casino sites that accept Skrill: payment checks
Deposits and Bonuses: Don’t Mistake an Offer for a Better Deal
A TRON casino bonus can look generous in a banner and turn out to be a poor fit once you read the terms. I’ve made that mistake with gambling offers: I focused on the headline and treated the conditions as small print. They weren’t. The useful comparison is not the advertised size of a TRX promotion, but what you must do to claim it and what restrictions apply before you can withdraw.
I would start by asking whether the offer is actually available for a TRON deposit. A promotion may be limited to particular payment methods, currencies, account types or customers. A page that mentions crypto generally does not establish that TRX deposits qualify. Nor does a bonus advertised for Bitcoin Cash tell you anything reliable about a TRON promotion. Different assets, different terms.
Then read the full bonus rules, not just the banner. Look for the wagering requirement and whether it applies to the bonus, the deposit, or both. Check which games count towards it, whether some games are excluded, and whether play contributes at different rates. A large headline amount can be less useful than a smaller offer with conditions you can understand and realistically meet.
Pay particular attention to restrictions on withdrawals. The terms may set a maximum cashout from bonus funds, require you to finish wagering first, or say that certain actions cancel the promotion. Check whether accepting the offer changes any withdrawal conditions for your own deposit or winnings. If the wording is vague, contradictory or hard to find, I would not treat the banner as a clear promise.
Expiry rules matter too. Check how long you have to opt in, use the bonus and complete its requirements, and what happens if you do not. Don’t assume that a bonus stays available because it appears in your account. Keep a copy of the terms shown when you accept it; promotional pages can change, and it helps to know what you agreed to.
EcoPayz Casino Sites in the UK: Check Payz Support
There are broad figures quoted for welcome offers at some casinos, and there are figures associated with licensed-operator rules. Neither tells you what a TRX promotion offers or how its conditions work. I would not use Bitcoin Cash bonus descriptions as a stand-in, either. If a review gives a specific TRON bonus but does not show the applicable terms, treat the claim as unconfirmed rather than filling in the gaps yourself.
A useful review should explain the conditions in plain language and distinguish a confirmed offer from a general claim. “Free” is an advertising word; it does not mean consequence-free. The real question is what you have to do, what you may lose access to by accepting, and whether the offer is worth the restrictions. If those answers are missing, the bonus is not a reason to choose that casino.
I also wouldn’t rank TRON casinos by bonus size alone. A promotion is temporary, and the headline can distract from terms that determine whether you can use it. Compare the actual rules displayed to you at sign-up, and don’t deposit just to unlock an offer you have not understood. If the conditions cannot be checked before you commit, walk away. Not worth guessing.
TRX Casino UK: What Can—and Can’t—Be Compared
A useful comparison needs more than a casino name beside a TRX logo. You need evidence about what the operator actually offers, the terms attached to it and the protections available if something goes wrong. I would not rank supposed UK TRX casinos on branding alone. Without reliable, operator-specific details, a “best” list would be guesswork dressed up as advice.
That leaves a narrower, more honest question: what can you establish before treating a site as a real option? Start with whether it is authorised to serve customers in Great Britain. A crypto payment label does not prove that. Nor does a site appearing in a list or describing itself as “UK-friendly”; that phrase tells you nothing by itself about its regulatory status.
Using an offshore casino means you lose the UKGC regulatory safety net, access to UKGC dispute resolution, and GamStop integration.
There is also a hard distinction between a casino that advertises TRX and one whose TRX service can be confirmed. A logo or a general claim is not enough to establish that deposits are accepted, that withdrawals are available in the same currency, or that the process works as described. Those are separate claims, and each needs direct, current evidence. I would not fill the gaps with assumptions based on another cryptocurrency or another operator.
The same restraint applies to comparisons of games, account conditions and customer support. A site may look polished, but that does not verify its catalogue or tell you how it handles a disputed balance. Compare only details you can check and that matter to your decision; otherwise the table creates a false sense of precision. Neat columns. Weak evidence.
For a UK player, the most important comparison is not a ranking of TRX brands. It is whether the operator is within the UK Gambling Commission’s system. Offshore casinos sit outside it. A player using one is not committing a criminal offence, but does not get the UKGC regulatory safety net, UKGC dispute resolution or GamStop integration. That is a real difference, not a footnote.
I have learned to distrust lists that make every option look equally established. If one entry has a verifiable licence and another relies on a payment badge or an untested promise, they are not comparable on equal terms. I would rather leave a row blank than pretend the information is settled.
Casinos That Accept Ukash in the UK: What to Check
So a responsible TRON casino comparison for a UK audience has limits: it can distinguish claims from evidence, and it can point out the protections that do or do not apply. It cannot responsibly name a winner, confirm a TRX product, or score unverified features. If a site’s case rests on claims you cannot substantiate, treat the ranking as marketing—not a recommendation.
TRON Casino Games and dApps: No Verified Titles to Name
A casino calling itself “TRON” can leave you with a basic question: what are you actually playing? The label might describe a payment option, a site’s branding or a claimed connection to a blockchain. It does not, by itself, identify a particular slot, table game or casino dApp.
That distinction matters if you are looking for TRON slot games in the UK. A game being available on a casino site is not the same as the game itself being built on TRON. Nor does seeing TRX mentioned tell you whether a title is an on-chain dApp, a conventional online game or simply part of a site’s wider catalogue. Those are separate claims, and I would want each one spelled out before treating them as fact.
I have learned not to mistake a polished lobby for proof of what sits behind it. Game tiles can make a catalogue look substantial, but a title name alone tells you little about its provider, how it works or whether the advertised connection to TRON is meaningful. “Blockchain-powered” is a sales phrase until the operator explains what that means for the specific game. Short version: labels aren’t details.
How to evaluate a TRON game or dApp
Look for a specific game name and an identified provider. Check if the description explicitly explains whether the title is an on-chain dApp or simply a conventional game offered by a casino that accepts TRX.
If you are considering playing casino games with TRON, look for information attached to the individual title rather than relying on a general headline. Is the game named? Is its provider identified? Does the description explain whether it is a dApp or simply offered by a casino that mentions TRX? If those answers are vague, you still do not know what you are being invited to play.
The same care applies to searches for a TRON casino app. An app or mobile-friendly lobby is a way to access a service; it does not establish that its games use TRON technology or that a particular title is available. Keep the access method separate from the game’s identity.
I would avoid treating a long list of familiar-sounding categories—slots, live tables, or instant games—as confirmation of a real catalogue. Categories are not titles, and a promise of “hundreds” would need a clear, current catalogue behind it. Without named games and useful details, there is nothing solid to compare at the content level.
So, if you are trying to find a specific TRON casino game or dApp, make the title itself the starting point. Ask what the game is, who provides it and what “TRON” refers to in that context. If a page cannot answer plainly, I would not fill in the blanks for it. Better to leave the lobby unexplored than mistake a crypto label for a verified game list.
Direct Banking Casinos: Payments and Checks Explained
Real-Money TRON Play: The UK Tax and Legality Context
If you are weighing up real-money play at a TRON casino, separate two questions that often get muddled: whether an individual is committing an offence by gambling offshore, and what tax applies to winnings. The answer to the first is limited but clear: UK law does not criminalise an individual for gambling with an offshore operator.
That does not turn the casino into a UK-licensed business, or make it safe or checked. An offshore site does not provide the UKGC regulatory safety net. If a dispute arises, you cannot rely on UKGC dispute resolution or expect the site to be connected to GamStop. I would not treat “legal for the player” as shorthand for “protected if something goes wrong”. Different things.
Tax is a separate point. In the United Kingdom, gambling winnings are not charged to income tax or capital gains tax, and that treatment does not change just because the balance is held in cryptocurrency rather than pounds. That is the position on the winnings themselves; it is not a blanket promise that every later transaction involving crypto has no tax consequences.
There is a specific disagreement worth keeping visible. One account says gambling winnings remain outside income and capital gains tax, while another says that converting Bitcoin Cash winnings into pounds may create a capital gains tax liability. That disagreement concerns BCH, not TRON, so it cannot settle the treatment of converting TRX. The two events should not be casually collapsed into one: receiving a gambling win and later disposing of a crypto asset are not necessarily the same tax question. If a meaningful sum is involved, get current, individual tax advice rather than relying on a casino’s promotional explanation.
In the United Kingdom, gambling winnings are generally not subject to income tax or capital gains tax, regardless of whether they are held in cryptocurrency or pounds.
The phrase “TRON casino welcome bonus” can make the offer sound like the main decision. It is not. A bonus does not establish the operator’s status, change the legal position on offshore gambling, or settle how a later crypto conversion would be treated. Nor does a “no deposit bonus” answer those questions. I would read the terms as an offer, not as legal or tax guidance.
So the UK context is narrow: an individual is not criminalised merely for gambling offshore, and gambling winnings themselves are not subject to income or capital gains tax, regardless of currency. Neither point verifies a TRX casino or removes the practical risks of using an offshore site. Keep those boundaries clear. A tax rule is not an endorsement.
Casinos Accepting TRON: The UK-Crypto Restriction
The key point is simple: a casino licensed in the UK cannot accept cryptocurrency for gambling. That includes TRON’s TRX token. So if you are looking for a casino that accepts TRON while also being UK-licensed, those two requirements conflict.
I used to treat a payment logo as a useful shortcut: if a site displayed a coin, I assumed it meant I could deposit that way and still get the protections I expected. It doesn’t tell you that. A TRX badge, wallet address or crypto-themed promotion is not proof that an operator holds a UK Gambling Commission licence, and it cannot override the restriction on licensed operators accepting crypto.
This matters when you see claims about online casinos taking TRON for UK players. The claim may describe a site that operates outside the UKGC system; it does not establish that the site is licensed to serve customers in Great Britain. An offshore casino may be reachable, but it does not have the UKGC regulatory safety net. You also do not get UKGC dispute resolution or GamStop integration there. That distinction is easy to miss when the payment option is presented as the main selling point.
I would separate the two questions before doing anything with a wallet: does the operator have a UKGC licence, and does it accept TRX? For a UK-licensed operator, the second answer cannot be yes. If a site says otherwise, don’t treat the claim as a clever exception. Check the operator against the Commission’s public register and be wary of any wording that blurs an offshore service into a UK-regulated one.
Instant Bank Transfer Casinos in the UK: A Guide
That does not mean every site advertising TRON is necessarily making the same claim, or that a crypto payment option tells you everything about its status. It means the payment method alone cannot make a site UK-licensed. I would not send funds on the strength of a “UK-friendly” label.
The short version: TRX acceptance and a UK gambling licence do not go together. If accepting TRON is non-negotiable, understand that you are looking beyond the UKGC-licensed market—and beyond its complaints route and safeguards. No clever wording changes that.
TRON Casinos and KYC: Don’t Assume ‘No KYC’ Means No Risk
“ No KYC” sounds like less hassle. I’ve learned not to treat that label as proof that a casino will never ask who you are, or that playing there carries fewer risks. Identity checks can depend on an operator’s rules and circumstances; a slogan is not a clear account of either.
Some specialist reviews describe Bitcoin Cash casinos as allowing sign-up with an email address and password or making only limited identity checks. That is a claim about the sites and payment method those reviews cover. It does not establish how a TRON casino handles KYC, and it should not be carried over to TRX by assumption. I would want a clear, current explanation of verification requirements from the operator before relying on any “no KYC” claim.
For a UK-licensed operator, age verification is required before a customer can deposit. But a claim that a site skips checks does not show that it has a UK licence. Online gambling offered to customers in Great Britain must be covered by the relevant Gambling Commission licence, wherever the operator is based. A licence can be checked on the Commission’s public register.
An offshore casino is outside the UKGC regulatory system. Playing there does not, by itself, make the individual player’s activity a criminal offence, but that is not the same as having the UKGC regulatory safety net. You will not have UKGC dispute resolution or GamStop integration there. If an identity dispute arises, you cannot assume the UK complaints route will be available.
That distinction matters. A site may advertise minimal checks, yet still set its own terms for requesting documents or restricting an account. I would read those terms before registering and keep a copy of what the operator says. If the rules are vague, that is a reason to pause, not a promise of privacy.
No shortcut. A TRON casino’s KYC policy needs to be established on its own terms; Bitcoin Cash examples do not answer it.
TRX as Casino Crypto: What the Evidence Doesn’t Establish
“Crypto casino” sounds like a single category, but the label can hide a basic question: which coin can the operator actually accept and pay out? A casino that handles one cryptocurrency is not automatically equipped to handle another. I used to read a coin’s name beside a casino and assume the rest would be straightforward. That was too generous.
Bitcoin Cash and TRON are separate assets, so a claim about BCH deposits or withdrawals tells you nothing about how a casino would process TRX. Confirmation times, withdrawal handling and wallet procedures are specific to the coin and the operator’s setup. They do not carry across just because both are described as crypto.
The same goes for broad promises such as “instant” or “seamless”. They sound reassuring, but they do not tell you whether TRX can be deposited, whether withdrawals can be made in TRX, or what conditions apply. A payment option needs to be confirmed in the operator’s own terms and cashier—not inferred from a general crypto label.
There is also a UK distinction worth keeping clear: the fact that a casino mentions TRX does not establish that it is authorised to serve British customers. For real-money gambling offered to people in Great Britain, the operator needs the relevant Gambling Commission licence. Coin support and regulatory status are different questions.
So I would treat TRX casino claims as specific claims, not as a natural extension of what another cryptocurrency can do. Look for clear operator terms covering the coin, deposits and withdrawals, and assess the operator’s status separately. If the wording stays vague, don’t fill in the blanks yourself.
Different coin. Different claim.
Can I legally deposit Bitcoin Cash at UK casinos?
No UK-licensed casino currently accepts Bitcoin Cash, and UK-licensed operators cannot accept cryptocurrency. Gambling offshore is not criminalised for individuals in the UK, but those casinos are outside UKGC protections.
What happens to identity verification at a Bitcoin Cash casino operating outside UK licensing?
These casinos usually use wallet-based deposits and minimal identity checks; many let you create an account with just an email address and password. That does not make deposits untraceable, as BCH transactions are public and can often be linked to a known exchange.
How fast are Bitcoin Cash casino withdrawals?
BCH cashouts at BC.Game and Stake have been processed within 10 minutes of a request, often in under five. Some casinos hold withdrawals above a threshold for a management review, with thresholds ranging from 0.5 to 2 BCH equivalent.
Are Bitcoin Cash casinos safe for UK players?
BCH casinos operating outside UK licensing do not provide UKGC safeguards, access to the Commission’s dispute resolution route or GamStop integration. Their deposits may also be traceable on the public blockchain.
Do I need to verify my identity to play at a BCH casino?
Often, offshore BCH casinos ask for only an email address and password to open an account, with minimal identity checks. However, this does not make your BCH transactions anonymous.
Are Bitcoin Cash casino winnings taxable in the UK?
No. Gambling winnings are not subject to UK income tax or capital gains tax, regardless of whether you play with GBP or cryptocurrency.
Is a casino accepting Bitcoin Cash automatically unlicensed for British players?
A UK-licensed casino cannot accept cryptocurrency, and no UK-licensed casino currently accepts BCH. A casino taking BCH is therefore not operating as a UKGC-licensed casino.